MR AIDAN TAM 譚朗峰 大律師 谭朗峰 大律师
Call 2007 認許 2007 认许 2007

 

Professional Qualification

  • Call (Hong Kong): 2007
  • Arbitrator, Zhuhai Arbitration Commission, People’s Republic of China – 2020

Appointments and Public Office

  • Member, Committee on Land, Trust and Probate, Hong Kong Bar Association (2019-2020)
  • Adjudicator, Immigration Tribunal (Oct 2019 – Sep 2021)
  • Chairman, Appeal Tribunal (Buildings) (Dec 2018 – Nov 2021)
  • Member, Private Columbaria Appeal Board (Sep 2017 – Sep 2023)
  • Member, Appeal Panel (Estate Agents Ordinance) (Jan 2017 – Dec 2022)
  • Adjudicator, Registration of Persons Tribunal (Dec 2014 – Nov 2020)

Education

  • LLM (Commercial & Corporate Law) (University of London (External))(2008)
  • PCLL (University of Hong Kong)(2006)
  • LLB (University of Hong Kong)(2005)

Language

  • English
  • Cantonese
  • Mandarin

Practice

Aidan has a general civil practice, with emphasis on land law, Chinese law and custom and law of probate and administration. 

Called to the Hong Kong Bar in 2007, Aidan has appeared in the Court of Final Appeal and the Court of Appeal in his own right and as junior for claims involving adverse possession and encroachment, principles of non-derogation from grant, proprietary estoppel, conveyancing, tsos and tongs, Beddoe Orders, law of succession, arbitration and insolvency and bankruptcy law.

Aidan has also undertaken court work and provided legal opinion on ding houses matters, companies' winding up, religious charitable trusts, intellectual property rights, town planning, building management, building and construction, professional negligence and family matters.

Selected Cases

Land

  • Rank Profit Industries Limited v Secretary for Justice [2009] 1 HKLRD 194 (CA); FAMV 8/2009, unreported, 25th June 2009 (CFA)
    Represented a property developer to sue the Director of Lands as agent of HKSAR Government qua landlord for derogation of grant in respect of a piece of commercial land in Kowloon Bay Industrial Area; also participated in the parallel proceedings of Rank Profit Industries Limited v Director of Lands [2009] 1 HKLRD 177 (CA); FAMV 7/2009, unreported, 25th June 2009 (CFA) in which the same property developer sought judicial review of a decision of the Director of Lands in respect of premium for lease modifications
  • Hong Kong Kam Lan Koon Ltd v Realray Investments Ltd (2010) 13 HKCFAR 215
    Adverse possession by a Taoist association against a property developer
  • Lee Bing Cheung v Secretary for Justice [2013] 3 HKC 511 (CFI); [2014] 6 HKC 351 (CA)
    Represented a squatter to claim against the Director of Lands as agent of HKSAR Government qua landlord in respect of a piece of unleased Government land adjoining his land held under Government Grant in Ah Kung Ngam, Hong Kong Island on the grounds of adverse possession, encroachment and proprietary estoppel; squatter obtained a declaration by virtue of encroachment that he was/is entitled to possession of the unleased Government Land as from 28th February 2009 until the determination of the Government Grant (a 999-year lease) of his own land
  • Chau Ka Chik Tso & Others v Secretary for Justice HCA 10670/2000, unreported, 30th December 2009
    Represented the squatters to sue the Director of Lands as agent of HKSAR Government qua landlord in respect of a huge piece of Government land adjoining their own lands held under Government Grants in Yuen Long, New Territories on the grounds of adverse possession, encroachment and proprietary estoppel; case proceeded to the Court of Final Appeal and became the precedent authority on the law of encroachment in Hong Kong
  • Tang Tak Sum & Another v Tang Kai Fong [2013] 4 HKLRD 16 (CFI); [2015] 1 HKLRD 286 (CA); [2020] 2 HKLRD 338
    law of accounting between co-owners of land; adverse possession against co-owner by ouster
  • Best Star Holdings Ltd v Lam Chun Hing & Others, HCA 409/2008, unreported, 22nd February 2012
    Represented the Plaintiff to obtain proprietary relief in respect of some land lots in the New Territories and the ding houses built thereon by proprietary estoppel by representation and proprietary estoppel by standing by

Chinese Law and Custom, Probate and Administration and Trust

  • Leung Lai Fong v Ho Sin Ying (2009) 12 HKCFAR 581
    Represented the stepmother (status acquired under Chinese law and custom) of a deceased medical doctor to contest with the natural mother in respect of the right of succession to the intestate estate of the deceased; Court of Final Appeal made the authoritative ruling that ‘mother’ in section 4(7) of the Intestates’ Estates Ordinance (Cap.73) can only mean the natural, biological mother
  • Re Man Sham Chung Wui HCMP 2417/2007, unreported, 21st January 2010; [2011] 1 HKLRD 427 (CA)
    Represented the majority members of a business Wui to obtain directions for sale of the Wui’s lands
  • Lam Yui Ming v Lam Yui Pun & Others [2020] HKCFI 2011
    Represented the manager of a tso to seek court directions regarding the administration and management of the tso; established the tso's custom regarding the mode of distribution of surplus rental income; the tso's custom on the mode of distribution of proceeds of sale of land and the issue of proper and correct mode of distribution of a tso's proceeds of sale of land under Chinese law and custom visited

Arbitration

  • S Co v B Co [2014] 6 HKC 421
    International arbitration; represented a Hong Kong consultancy company to obtain arbitral awards for consultancy fee against a Mainland construction company in respect of the building and construction of 2 electrical power plants in the Federal Republic of Nigeria; successfully resisted the construction company’s application for setting aside the arbitral awards
  • Kim Hung Construction & Engineering Co Ltd v Standard Refrigeration & Engineering Co Ltd HCCT 37/2012, unreported, 21st June 2013; CACV 90/2015, unreported, 7th January 2016
    Domestic arbitration; represented a main contractor to obtain an arbitral award for damages against a sub-contractor in respect of construction works for the improvement of infection control provisions for autopsy facilities in public hospitals; successfully appealed and set aside the sub-contractor’s arbitral award for damages in respect of delay for giving possession of the hospitals

Insolvency & Bankruptcy

  • China Merchants Bank Co Ltd & Another v Cheng Chao Ming [2010] 3 HKLRD 485 (CA)
    Represented the bankrupt to resist the bank’s application for his relevant period of bankruptcy to cease to run for a second time during the currency of the same bankruptcy order; Court of Appeal held that the Court has no jurisdiction under section 30A(3) of the Bankruptcy Ordinance (Cap.6) to order the relevant period of bankruptcy to cease to run for more than one time
  • Re Richfame Dynasty Limited [2018] HKCFI 1532
    Represented the shareholders to obtain an order for permanent stay of winding up of the company
  • Re ACE International (BVI) Limited [2020] 2 HKLRD 508
    Striking out of a petition for winding up on the just and equitable ground against a foreign incorporated company on the ground that the petitioner has acted unreasonably in seeking to have the company wound up instead of pursuing remedies in an unfair prejudice claim in the place of incorporation of the company pursuant to section 180(1A) of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap.32)

Other Cases

  • Blandina Quintinita Parsons v Catriona Jane Derry Parsons and Others FCMP 14/2014; HCMP 975/2017, unreported, 6th July 2017 (CA)
    Jurisdictional requirements of domicile and ordinary residence in the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Ordinance (Cap.481))
  • Wong Hung Kar Kee Mimi v Severn Villa Ltd [2014] 1 HKLRD 1088
    Civil procedure; application of functus officio principle and slip rule to court orders including consent judgments; variation of costs order nisi; certificate for counsel in orders for costs on indemnity basis
  • Cheung Sun Lam v Lai Kam Man [2008] 5 HKC 1 (CA)
    Civil procedure; principles of taxation in respect of certificate for counsel and counsel’s fees; practices of pupillage, pupil master’s duty, complimentary brief and impact on taxation of counsel’s fees

 

專業資格

  • 認許年份(香港):2007
  • 中華人民共和國珠海仲裁委員會仲裁員:2020

任命及公職

  • 香港大律師公會—土地、信託及遺囑認證專業委員會成員 (2019-2020)
  • 入境事務審裁處審裁員 (2019年10月至2021年9月)
  • 上訴審裁處(建築物)主席 (2018年12月至2021年11月)
  • 私營骨灰安置所上訴委員會成員 (2017年9月至2023年9月)
  • 上訴委員團(地產代理條例)成員 (2017年1月至2022年12月)
  • 人事登記審裁處審裁員 (2014年12月至2020年11月)

學歷

  • 倫敦大學(遙矩)法學碩士(商業及公司法)(2008)
  • 香港大學法學專業證書 (2006)
  • 香港大學法學士 (2005)

語言

  • 英文及中文(廣東話及普通話)

執業簡介

譚朗峰執業的範圍,涵蓋各類型的民事訴訟,並專注於土地法 (land law)、中國傳統法律及習俗 (Chinese law and custom) 以及遺囑認證及遺產管理法 (law of probate and administration)。

譚朗峰屢次獨自及協助資深大律師,代表客戶出席終審法院及上訴法院的聆訊,有關案件涉及逆權侵佔 (adverse possession)、據用原則 (encroachment)、反對所售權的減損原則 (principles of non-derogation from grant)、所有權不容反悔 (proprietary estoppel)、物業轉易 (conveyancing)、祖堂 (tsos and tongs)、Beddoe Orders、繼承法 (law of succession)、仲裁 (arbitration) 及破產清算法 (insolvency and bankruptcy law)。

譚朗峰亦有處理有關丁屋 (ding houses)、公司清盤 (companies’ winding up)、宗教慈善信託 (religious charitable trusts)、知識產權 (intellectual property rights)、城市規劃 (town planning)、建築物管理 (building management)、建築工程 (building and construction)、專業疏忽 (professional negligence) 及家事法 (family law)的訴訟,並提供法律意見。

案件選例

土地法

  • Rank Profit Industries Limited v Secretary for Justice [2009] 1 HKLRD 194 (CA); FAMV 8/2009, unreported, 25th June 2009 (CFA)
    代表土地發展商,以反對所售權的減損原則,就九龍灣工業區一幅商業用途土地向香港特別行政區政府的地政總署提訴。同時,亦參與同一土地發展商,就地政總署對改變該土地的土地用途而收取的補地價提出的司法覆核,見Rank Profit Industries Limited v Director of Lands [2009] 1 HKLRD 177 (CA); FAMV 7/2009, unreported, 25th June 2009 (CFA)
  • Hong Kong Kam Lan Koon Ltd v Realray Investments Ltd (2010) 13 HKCFAR 215
    代表一所道教團體,以逆權侵佔的原則,就一幅土地向土地發展商提告
  • Lee Bing Cheung v Secretary for Justice [2013] 3 HKC 511 (CFI); [2014] 6 HKC 351 (CA)
    代表一名佔用人,以逆權侵佔、據用原則及所有權不容反悔的法律原則,就一幅位於香港島亞公岩的政府官地提告,成功獲得法院聲明,可從2009年2月28日起據用該政府官地,直至其999年的政府租用地到期時一并交還
  • Chau Ka Chik Tso & Others v Secretary for Justice HCA 10670/2000, unreported, 30th December 2009
    代表一眾佔用人,以逆權侵佔、據用原則及所有權不容反悔的法律原則,就其新界元朗政府租用地鄰近的一幅龐大政府官地提告,案件最終上訴至終審法院,成為香港有關據用原則的最權威案例
  • Tang Tak Sum & Another v Tang Kai Fong [2013] 4 HKLRD 16 (CFI); [2015] 1 HKLRD 286 (CA); [2020] 2 HKLRD 338
    土地的共同擁有人的帳目法則;土地的共同擁有人以奪取形式逆權侵佔
  • Best Star Holdings Ltd v Lam Chun Hing & Others, HCA 409/2008, unreported, 22nd February 2012
    代表原告人,以所有權不容反悔的法律原則,就多幅新界土地及其上蓋丁屋獲得法院的土地權益聲明

中國傳統法律及習俗、遺囑認證及遺產管理法 、信託法

  • Leung Lai Fong v Ho Sin Ying (2009) 12 HKCFAR 581
    代表一名已故醫生的繼母(中國傳統法律及習俗認可的身份),與該死者的生母就該死者遺產的無遺囑繼承權應訊,終審法院作出權威性的判決,裁定《無遺囑者遺產條例》(香港法例第73章)第4(7)條的「母親」一詞只可詮釋為生母
  • Re Man Sham Chung Wui HCMP 2417/2007, unreported, 21st January 2010; [2011] 1 HKLRD 427 (CA)
    代表一所商業會堂的大多數持份者,獲得出售該會堂的土地的法庭指引
  • Lam Yui Ming v Lam Yui Pun & Others [2020] HKCFI 2011
    代表一所祖堂的司理,向法院尋求有關管理祖堂的指示;確立該祖堂有關土地租金收入的分配方法的習俗;闡述該祖堂有關賣地收益的分配方法的習俗、以及中國傳統法律及習俗認可的祖堂賣地收益的正確分配方法的論點

仲裁

  • S Co v B Co [2014] 6 HKC 421
    國際仲裁;代表一間香港顧問公司,成功向一間內地建築工程公司就拖欠的顧問費索償,有關工程為尼日利亞共和國兩座發電廠的興建工程,其後再成功抵抗建築工程公司就該仲裁令向香港高等法院提出的上訴
  • Kim Hung Construction & Engineering Co Ltd v Standard Refrigeration & Engineering Co Ltd HCCT 37/2012, unreported, 21st June 2013; CACV 90/2015, unreported, 7th January 2016
    本地仲裁;代表建築工程總承判商,就進行公立醫院的通風設備工程產生的損失,成功向承判商索償,其後再就總承判商因場地交付延遲而需向承判商賠償的仲裁令,向香港高等法院提出上訴,獲判上訴得直

破產清算法

  • China Merchants Bank Co Ltd & Another v Cheng Chao Ming [2010] 3 HKLRD 485 (CA)
    代表破產人,成功阻擋債權人要求第二度延長其破產令的申請,上訴法院裁定,《破產條例》(香港法例第6章)第30A(3)條,並沒有賦予法院延長破產令超過一次的權利
  • Re Richfame Dynasty Limited [2018] HKCFI 1532
    代表公司股東,成功獲取永久擱置公司清盤的命令
  • Re ACE International (BVI) Limited [2020] 2 HKLRD 508
    剔除對一間外地成立的公司、以公正公平為由作出的清盤呈請,基礎是呈請人沒有於公司成立地以不公平損害的訴因尋求補救方法,根據《公司(清盤及雜項條文)條例》(香港法例第32章) 第180(1A)條,其尋求公司清盤的呈請屬不合理

其他

  • Blandina Quintinita Parsons v Catriona Jane Derry Parsons and Others FCMP 14/2014; HCMP 975/2017, unreported, 6th July 2017 (CA)
    《財產承繼(供養遺屬及受養人)條例》(香港法例第481章)有關居藉及通常居住的管轄權要求
  • Wong Hung Kar Kee Mimi v Severn Villa Ltd [2014] 1 HKLRD 1088
    民事訴訟原則;應用法庭已履行職務原則 (functus officio) 及意外失誤原則 (slip rule) 於法庭命令包括同意命令;更改暫定訟費命令;彌償基準下頒布大律師證書的原則
  • Cheung Sun Lam v Lai Kam Man [2008] 5 HKC 1 (CA)
    民事訴訟原則;有關大律師證書及大律師費用的訟費評定原則;大律師實習期的師徒關係及安排,以及其對大律師費用的訟費評定的影響

 

专业资格

  • 认许年份(香港):2007
  • 中华人民共和国珠海仲裁委员会仲裁员:2020

任命及公职

  • 香港大律师公会—土地、信托及遗嘱认证专业委员会成员(2019-2020)
  • 入境事务审裁处审裁员 (2019年10月至2021年9月)
  • 上诉审裁处(建筑物)主席 (2018年12月至2021年11 月)
  • 私营骨灰安置所上诉委员会成员 (2017年9月至2023年9 月)
  • 上诉委员团(地产代理条例)成员 (2017年1月至2022年12 月)
  • 人事登记审裁处审裁员 (2014年12月至2020年11月)

学历

  • 伦敦大学(遥矩)法学硕士(商业及公司法)(2008)
  • 香港大学法学专业证书 (2006)
  • 香港大学法学士 (2005)

语言

  • 英文及中文(广东话及普通话)

执业简介

谭朗峰执业的范围,涵盖各类型的民事诉讼,并专注于土地法 (land law)、中国传统法律及习俗 (Chinese law and custom) 以及遗嘱认证及遗产管理法 (law of probate and administration)。

谭朗峰屡次独自及协助资深大律师,代表客户出席终审法院及上诉法院的聆讯,有关案件涉及逆权侵占 (adverse possession)、据用原则 ( encroachment)、反对所售权的减损原则 (principles of non-derogation from grant)、所有权不容反悔 ( proprietary estoppel)、物业转易 (conveyancing)、祖堂 (tsos and tongs)、 Beddoe Orders、继承法 (law of succession)、仲裁 (arbitration)及破产清算法(insolvency and bankruptcy law)。

谭朗峰亦有处理有关丁屋 (ding houses)、公司清盘 (companies’ winding up)、 宗教慈善信托 (religious charitable trusts)、知识产权 (intellectual property rights)、城市规划(town planning)、建筑物管理(building management)、建筑工程(building and construction)、专业疏忽(professional negligence)及家事法(family law)的诉讼,并提供法律意见。

案件选例

土地法

  • Rank Profit Industries Limited v Secretary for Justice [2009] 1 HKLRD 194 (CA); FAMV 8/2009, unreported, 25th June 2009 (CFA)
    代表土地发展商,以反对所售权的减损原则,就九龙湾工业区一幅商业用途土地向香港特别行政区政府的地政总署提诉。同时,亦参与同一土地发展商,就地政总署对改变该土地的土地用途而收取的补地价提出的司法覆核,见Rank Profit Industries Limited v Director of Lands [2009] 1 HKLRD 177 (CA); FAMV 7/2009, unreported, 25th June 2009 (CFA)
  • Hong Kong Kam Lan Koon Ltd v Realray Investments Ltd (2010) 13 HKCFAR 215
    代表一所道教团体,以逆权侵占的原则,就一幅土地向土地发展商提告
  • Lee Bing Cheung v Secretary for Justice [2013] 3 HKC 511 (CFI); [2014] 6 HKC 351 (CA)
    代表一名占用人,以逆权侵占、据用原则及所有权不容反悔的法律原则,就一幅位于香港岛亚公岩的政府官地提告,成功获得法院声明,可从2009年2月28日起据用该政府官地,直至其999年的政府租用地到期时一并交还
  • Chau Ka Chik Tso & Others v Secretary for Justice HCA 10670/2000, unreported, 30th December 2009
    代表一众占用人,以逆权侵占、据用原则及所有权不容反悔的法律原则,就其新界元朗政府租用地邻近的一幅庞大政府官地提告,案件最终上诉至终审法院,成为香港有关据用原则的最权威案例
  • Tang Tak Sum & Another v Tang Kai Fong [2013] 4 HKLRD 16 (CFI); [2015] 1 HKLRD 286 (CA); [2020] 2 HKLRD 338
    土地的共同拥有人的帐目法则;土地的共同拥有人以夺取形式逆权侵占
  • Best Star Holdings Ltd v Lam Chun Hing & Others, HCA 409/2008, unreported, 22nd February 2012
    代表原告人,以所有权不容反悔的法律原则,就多幅新界土地及其上盖丁屋获得法院的土地权益声明

中国传统法律及习俗、遗嘱认证及遗产管理法 、信托法

  • Leung Lai Fong v Ho Sin Ying (2009) 12 HKCFAR 581
    代表一名已故医生的继母(中国传统法律及习俗认可的身份),与该死者的生母就该死者遗产的无遗嘱继承权应讯,终审法院作出权威性的判决,裁定《无遗嘱者遗产条例》(香港法例第73章)第4(7)条的“母亲”一词只可诠释为生母
  • Re Man Sham Chung Wui HCMP 2417/2007, unreported, 21st January 2010; [2011] 1 HKLRD 427 (CA)
    代表一所商业会堂的大多数持份者,获得出售该会堂的土地的法庭指引
  • Lam Yui Ming v Lam Yui Pun & Others [2020] HKCFI 2011
    代表一所祖堂的司理,向法院寻求有关管理祖堂的指示;确立该祖堂有关土地租金收入的分配方法的习俗;阐述该祖堂有关卖地收益的分配方法的习俗、以及中国传统法律及习俗认可的祖堂卖地收益的正确分配方法的论点

仲裁

  • S Co v B Co [2014] 6 HKC 421
    国际仲裁;代表一间香港顾问公司,成功向一间内地建筑工程公司就拖欠的顾问费索偿,有关工程为尼日利亚共和国两座发电厂的兴建工程,其后再成功抵抗建筑工程公司就该仲裁令向香港高等法院提出的上诉
  • Kim Hung Construction & Engineering Co Ltd v Standard Refrigeration & Engineering Co Ltd HCCT 37/2012, unreported, 21st June 2013; CACV 90/2015, unreported, 7th January 2016
    本地仲裁;代表建筑工程总承判商,就进行公立医院的通风设备工程产生的损失,成功向承判商索偿,其后再就总承判商因场地交付延迟而需向承判商赔偿的仲裁令,向香港高等法院提出上诉,获判上诉得直

破产清算法

  • China Merchants Bank Co Ltd & Another v Cheng Chao Ming [2010] 3 HKLRD 485 (CA)
    代表破产人,成功阻挡债权人要求第二度延长其破产令的申请,上诉法院裁定,《破产条例》(香港法例第6章)第30A(3)条,并没有赋予法院延长破产令超过一次的权利
  • Re Richfame Dynasty Limited [2018] HKCFI 1532
    代表公司股东,成功获取永久搁置公司清盘的命令
  • Re ACE International (BVI) Limited [2020] 2 HKLRD 508
    剔除对一间外地成立的公司、以公正公平为由作出的清盘呈请,基础是呈请人没有于公司成立地以不公平损害的诉因寻求补救方法,根据《公司(清盘及杂项条文)条例》(香港法例第32章) 第180(1A)条,其寻求公司清盘的呈请属不合理

其他

  • Blandina Quintinita Parsons v Catriona Jane Derry Parsons and Others FCMP 14/2014; HCMP 975/2017, unreported, 6th July 2017 (CA)
    《财产承继(供养遗属及受养人)条例》(香港法例第481章)有关居借及通常居住的管辖权要求
  • Wong Hung Kar Kee Mimi v Severn Villa Ltd [2014] 1 HKLRD 1088
    民事诉讼原则;应用法庭已履行职务原则 (functus officio) 及意外失误原则 (slip rule) 于法庭命令包括同意命令;更改暂定讼费命令;弥偿基准下颁布大律师证书的原则
  • Cheung Sun Lam v Lai Kam Man [2008] 5 HKC 1 (CA)
    民事诉讼原则;有关大律师证书及大律师费用的讼费评定原则;大律师实习期的师徒关系及安排,以及其对大律师费用的讼费评定的影响